<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who needs a jury when we have Nancy Grace?</title>
	<link>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16</link>
	<description>Jammer's random blog that simply do what it do.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 04:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Hotshot309</title>
		<link>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-23</link>
		<author>Hotshot309</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Nancy Grace must be a unanimously ridiculed moron--Law and Order: Criminal Intent even came up with a fictional analogue to Grace, whose annoying dyed-blond Southern head and outrageous one-sided comments--which are meant to caricature Grace but are pretty true to life--"Grace" the show with their presence every few episodes.

I think Nancy Grace just didn't make the cut for Fox News, so she ended up on CNN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nancy Grace must be a unanimously ridiculed moron&#8211;Law and Order: Criminal Intent even came up with a fictional analogue to Grace, whose annoying dyed-blond Southern head and outrageous one-sided comments&#8211;which are meant to caricature Grace but are pretty true to life&#8211;&#8221;Grace&#8221; the show with their presence every few episodes.</p>
<p>I think Nancy Grace just didn&#8217;t make the cut for Fox News, so she ended up on CNN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apollo</title>
		<link>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-37</link>
		<author>Apollo</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 02:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-37</guid>
					<description>Not to mention, she stretches the truth a bit:

http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp

And doesn't care as much about ethics as she claims:

http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&#38;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&#38;cid=1115111123854</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, she stretches the truth a bit:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.observer.com/20060306/20060306_Rebecca_Dana_pageone_nytv.asp</a></p>
<p>And doesn&#8217;t care as much about ethics as she claims:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&amp;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&amp;cid=1115111123854" rel="nofollow">http://www.law.com/jsp/printerfriendly.jsp?c=LawArticle&amp;t=PrinterFriendlyArticle&amp;cid=1115111123854</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gatton</title>
		<link>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-129</link>
		<author>Gatton</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.idwid.com/blog/archives/16#comment-129</guid>
					<description>Fortunately she apologizes on air when the accused are acquitted right? Anybody?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fortunately she apologizes on air when the accused are acquitted right? Anybody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
